An Approach to Technical AGI Safety and Security

This site is based on the Google DeepMind report "An Approach to Technical AGI Safety and Security" published in April 2025. The report outlines a strategic framework for addressing severe risks from while enabling its potential benefits.

Original Authors

Rohin Shah, Alex Irpan, Alexander Matt Turner, Anna Wang, Arthur Conmy, David Lindner, Jonah Brown-Cohen, Lewis Ho, Neel Nanda, Raluca Ada Popa, Rishub Jain, Rory Greig, Samuel Albanie, Scott Emmons, Sebastian Farquhar, Sébastien Krier, Senthooran Rajamanoharan, Sophie Bridgers, Tobi Ijitoye, Tom Everitt, Victoria Krakovna, Vikrant Varma, Vladimir Mikulik, Zachary Kenton, Dave Orr, Shane Legg, Noah Goodman, Allan Dafoe, Four Flynn and Anca Dragan.

Report Context

This comprehensive report presents a strategic framework for addressing severe risks from AGI. The paper focuses on technical approaches to ensure safety and security as AI systems become increasingly powerful.

Key Highlights

  • Focus on Severe Harm: The report targets risks that could cause significant harm to humanity, requiring proactive rather than reactive mitigation strategies.
  • Four Risk Areas: The authors identify four categories of risks: misuse (where users intentionally cause harm), misalignment (where the AI system knowingly acts against developer intent), mistakes (unintentional harmful outputs), and structural risks (harms from multi-agent dynamics).
  • Two Primary Concerns: The strategy concentrates on misuse and misalignment as the most pressing concerns requiring technical interventions.
  • Misuse Mitigation Strategy: Evaluate models for dangerous capabilities, implement security and deployment safeguards, and test mitigation effectiveness through red-teaming.
  • Misalignment Approach: Develop "amplified oversight" to help humans supervise increasingly capable AI, create robust training methods, and implement defense-in-depth with monitoring and security techniques.
  • Research Areas: The report highlights several enabling technologies including interpretability, uncertainty quantification, and safer design patterns.
  • Core Assumptions: The authors base their approach on assumptions that include the continuation of current AI development paradigms, no inherent ceiling to AI capabilities, uncertain development timelines, the potential for accelerating capability growth, and approximately continuous progress.

This work represents a roadmap rather than a complete solution, acknowledging the many open research problems that still need to be addressed to safely develop advanced AI systems while accessing their potential benefits.

Disclaimer

This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to Google DeepMind or any of the original authors of the report. This is an independent educational resource created to provide information about the concepts discussed in the report.

All content from the original report is copyright © 2025 Google DeepMind, with all rights reserved. This site is provided for educational purposes only and makes no claims of accuracy or completeness. The site creator takes no responsibility for any errors or omissions in the content.

Contact

If you have any questions or feedback about this resource, please feel free to reach out.